Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:31:18 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-V0.7.33-0 |
| |
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 22:18 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > the two projects are obviously complementary and i have no intention to > > reinvent the wheel in any way. Best would be to bring hires timers up to > > upstream-mergable state (independently of the -RT patch) and ask Andrew > > to include it in -mm, then i'd port -RT to it automatically. > > Among other things I think Paul Davis mentioned that George's high res > timer patch would make it possible for JACK to send MIDI clock. This > would be a huge improvement.
<clueless question> roughly what latency/accuracy requirements does the MIDI clock have, and why is it an advantage if Linux generates it? What generates it otherwise - external MIDI hardware? Or was the problem mainly not latency/accuracy but that Linux couldnt generate a finegrained enough clock?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |