| From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: dynamic-hz | Date | Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:40:11 +1100 |
| |
Lee Revell writes:
> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:36 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: >> The performance benefit, if any, is often lost in noise during >> benchmarks and when there, is less than 1%. > > I have measured 2.1-2.3% residency for the timer ISR on my 600Mhz VIA > C3. And this is a desktop - you have many many embedded systems that > are slower. For these systems the difference is very real.
Could you explain residency and it's relevance to throughput please? I've not heard this term before.
Cheers, Con
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|