lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: dynamic-hz
Date
Lee Revell writes:

> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:36 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> The performance benefit, if any, is often lost in noise during
>> benchmarks and when there, is less than 1%.
>
> I have measured 2.1-2.3% residency for the timer ISR on my 600Mhz VIA
> C3. And this is a desktop - you have many many embedded systems that
> are slower. For these systems the difference is very real.

Could you explain residency and it's relevance to throughput please? I've
not heard this term before.

Cheers,
Con

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.220 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site