Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Dec 2004 07:57:08 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: dynamic-hz |
| |
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 07:50:31AM -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > Shouldn't that be a bug anyway regardless of dynamic-hz?
Yes of course. And in theory in 2.6 it'll be easier to implement than it was in 2.4, since it has a chance to be already using USER_HZ at compile time instead of HZ. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |