[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__
    On Nov 30, 2004, Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

    > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

    >> On Nov 30, 2004, Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

    >> > If you want to use a legal analogy, the ABI is not a contract, it's a
    >> > public _license_.

    >> I didn't mean to use a legal analogy. I meant contract in the
    >> software engineering sense. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

    > Then your definition of a "contract" is flawed or your world-view has
    > nothing to do with reality.

    It's not my definition, it's a definition used in software
    engineering. Sure, if you ask a legal mind, you'll get a different
    answer. If you ask a bridge player, you'll get yet another
    definition. That's why we have jargons in which common-use words have
    their meanings narrowed to the specifics of certain fields. And
    that's why it's so hard for specialists in different fields to talk to
    each other at times when there's disagreement about the precise
    meaning of certain words.

    > An ABI is not a contract.

    Not a legal contract, for sure.

    An ABI is a definition of an interface, including operations with pre-
    and post-conditions, data structures with their invariants, constants,
    file formats, etc. Most of that is covered by the software
    engineering term `contract'.

    Sure enough, the headers we're talking about describe only a very
    small portion on that; pretty much only data structures and
    constants. It certainly doesn't *specify* the entire ABI, it only
    highlights portions of it.

    Anyhow, all of this is beyond the point. I see you've decreed that
    people can introduce `user' directories in the kernel now. Would you
    please reconsider and choose a dir name that would enable the same ABI
    headers to be used by kernel and userland, without adding a directory
    to /usr/include that has no indication that it comes from the kernel?


    Alexandre Oliva
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{,}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{,}
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.021 / U:40.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site