lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers
From
Date
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 12:09 -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
> This is exactly the argument I hoped would *not* arise on the LKML. I'll
> try not to reply further unelss someone posts something fundmanetally new.
>
> > Anyone copying and distributing the Linux kernel must comply with the
> > copyright licence which _conditionally_ grants them permission to do so.
>
> *sigh* We're not talking about anyone copying or distributing *the* Linux
> kernel. We're talking about someone copying or distributing another work
> that is derivative of the Linux kernel (which is also *a* Linux kernel, just
> not *the* Linux kernel). This is true whether they distribute the module
> separately or linked with the Linux kernel. In either case, they are not
> distributing the actual work placed under the GPL but a distinct, yet
> derivative, work.

Ah, OK. So as long as they change one line of code in the kernel, it's a
derivative work and they're no longer required to comply with the GPL?
They don't even need to use binary-only modules; they can put their own
proprietary code into their kernel, and distribute it how they like?

An interesting opinion.

--
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.041 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site