lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] shmtcl SHM_LOCK perms
* Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com) wrote:
> But that's not the only reason for SHM_LOCK, and all you're telling us
> there is that the owner of sensitive data should be careful who they
> give read permission to - indeed! So I still tend to agree with
> Michael, that the most natural restriction is to owner or creator -
> relax that if some app actually has a good case for relaxing it.

Yup, I agree.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.062 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site