Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:55:33 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] shmtcl SHM_LOCK perms |
| |
* Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com) wrote: > But that's not the only reason for SHM_LOCK, and all you're telling us > there is that the owner of sensitive data should be careful who they > give read permission to - indeed! So I still tend to agree with > Michael, that the most natural restriction is to owner or creator - > relax that if some app actually has a good case for relaxing it.
Yup, I agree.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |