[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__

    On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > > I really disagree. That's kind of my point. We _can_ make sure that there
    > > is abzolutely zero semantic content change.
    > We've _never_ made sure that there's absolutely zero semantic content
    > change in our private headers.

    Not true. For example, I don't take spelling fixes that do semantic
    content changes.

    See? The more trivial the fix, the more obviously correct it has to be.

    This isn't even a "fix". It's a cleanup. It goes under the same rules a
    spelling fix does.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.030 / U:1.904 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site