lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: is killing zombies possible w/o a reboot?
Date
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 14:03, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> writes:
>> On Wednesday 03 November 2004 12:44, DervishD wrote:
>>> Hi Gene :)
>>>
>>> * Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> dixit:
>>>> > Or write a little program that just 'wait()'s for the
>>>> > specified PID's. That is perfectly portable IMHO. But I must
>>>> > admit that the preferred way should be killing the parent.
>>>> > 'init' will reap the children after that.
>>>>
>>>> But what if there is no parent, since the system has already
>>>> disposed of it?
>>>
>>> Then the children are reparented to 'init' and 'init' gets rid
>>> of them. That's the way UNIX behaves.
>>
>> Unforch, I've *never* had it work that way. Any dead process I've
>> ever had while running linux has only been disposable by a reboot.
>
>That's because its parent was still sitting around refusing to
> wait() for them.

Define 'parent' when it was a click on the apps icon on the xwindow
screen that started it, please.

--
Cheers, gene
gheskett at wdtv dot com
99.28% setiathome rank, not too bad for a WV hillbilly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site