Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:15:04 +0900 | From | Takao Indoh <> | Subject | Re: [lkdump-develop] Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/7] Diskdump 1.0 Release |
| |
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:45:13 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> >> I think kexec-dump is not stable yet. > >Do you have any facts to back this up? Is your project more stable ? >What is the success rate of dumps of diskdump ? How does that compare to >kexec-dump under the same circumstances ?
Sorry, a word "stable" was not appropriate. I meant that kexec-dump was under development yet. kexec-dump works well on i386/x86_64, but it is in the development stage on other architectures.
>> I heard that kexec-dump of >> some architecture (ex. ia64) had some problems and not worked. > >wouldn't it be better to then help finish that rather than making an >alternative ?
It is, if diskdump project just started now. But the basic code of diskdump is almost completed. I think it is more efficient to enhance quality of diskdump than help kexec-dump.
Best Regards, Takao Indoh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |