![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:36:22PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >In particular, any re-organization that breaks _existing_ uses is totally > >pointless. If you break existing uses, you might as well _not_ re- > >organize, since if you consider kernel headers to be purely kernel- > >internal (like they should be, but hey, reality trumps any wishes we might > >have), then the current organization is perfectly fine.> > > I don't think any drastic reorganization is even necessary. Well, we want things to be split. However a split doesn't mean a reorganisation as far as userspace visibility is concerned; the filenames can still be the same, and the typenames etc etc, you just do the kernel internal additions in a different dir/header Not breaking userland ever is a dream only, anytime we touch any header, some userland breaks (they use our spinlock code even!) > kernel-specific stuff stripped out. i.e. userland ABI only. Not sure > how many distros have started picking that up yet... I think Arjan said > Fedora Core had, or would. nope. Fedora has it's own set of cleaned up headers. Cleaned up in the sense that tehre's no #ifdef KERNEL anymore, no inlines (because that's a license trap, and in addition, all inlines were kernel specific anyway) and all structs which had spinlocks / semaphores and other kernel private structures in are removed as well (because they are clearly kernel internal). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||