Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Problem with ioctl command TCGETS | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:42:51 +0000 |
| |
On Sul, 2004-11-28 at 12:18, Al Viro wrote: > Think read(2)/write(2). We already have several barfbags too many, > and that includes both ioctl() and setsockopt(). We are stuck with > them for compatibility reasons, but why the hell would we need yet > another one?
Synchronization.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |