![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 10:11:43PM +0100, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > >If we go for some resturcturing of include/ then we should get rid of > >the annoying asm symlink. Following layout deals with that: > > > >include/<arch>/asm <= Files from include/asm-<arch> > >include/<arch>/mach* <= Files from include/mach-* > > > >This layout solve the symlink issue in an elegant way. > >We need to do trivial changes to compiler options to make it work. Changing > >compiler options is much more relaible than using symlinks. > > > >Then the userspace part would then be located in: > >include/<arch>/user-asm > > > > This complicates things for bi-arch architectures like x86_64 where one > can use a dispatcher directory instead of a symlink to suit include/asm > for 32bit as well as 64bit. X86_64 does not create any special symlinks todays so I do not see the point? And still a symlink is just the wrong way to solve the problem. Adjusting options to the compiler is the way to do it. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||