lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectCONFIG_TULIP_NAPI_HW_MITIGATION latency question.



Justin Piszcz writes:
> "at the cost of a small latency"
>
> How much additional latency is added with this option enabled?
>
> 5ms? 10ms?
>
> -> Use Interrupt Mitigation
> x CONFIG_TULIP_NAPI_HW_MITIGATION:
> x Use HW to reduce RX interrupts. Not strict necessary since NAPI
> reduces RX interrupts but itself. Although this reduces RX interrupts even at
> low levels traffic at the cost of a small latency.
> x
> x If in doubt, say Y.

Hello!

It's in usec and the tulip only enables this latency when it's needed it
really tries to keep latency down.

It has three steeps of input control.

Low rate: No driver latency. No interrupt delay at all.
Medium rate: Samll driver latency.
High rate: Polling via ->poll

--ro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.059 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site