Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:25:09 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Suspend 2 merge |
| |
Hi!
> > For swsusp2, you need drivers to stop the DMA, NMI not interfering, > > sync may not happen after you have saved LRU, memory may not be > > alocated from slab after you have saved LRU. (something else? This > > needs to be written down somewhere, and all kernel hackers will need > > to be carefull not to break these rules. Do you see why it wories me?) > > > > swsusp1 is more self-contained. As long as drivers stop the DMA and > > NMI does nothing wrong, atomic snapshot will indeed be atomic. > > Here is a grabed memory allocate patch from suspend2, useful for shrink memory > in high memory using system.
Sorry, I do not understand. What problem is this solving? Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |