Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:57:27 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] let fat handle MS_SYNCHRONOUS flag |
| |
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote: > > > It does have the downside that it'll teach our users bad practices.... > > Dunno. Right now they'll still probably have an occassional kernel > crash to contend with from device disappearing from under an fs, but > at least they won't have lost all the photos on their camera...
Yes, but after a fisaco like that, they'll remember to type `umount'!
Maybe I wasn't cut out for a career as an educator. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |