[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] let fat handle MS_SYNCHRONOUS flag
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch is an RFC patch not to be applied.
> It adds MS_SYNCHRONOUS support to FAT filesystem, so that less
> filesystem breakage happen when disconnecting an USB key, for
> example. I'd like to have comments about it, because as it
> seems to work fine here, I'm not used to fs drivers and could
> have made mistakes.
> Thanks,
> + if (bh != NULL) {
> + sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
> + brelse(bh);
> + } else {
> + BUG_ON(1);

This construct is really weird.

How about:


Concept seems good, and the implementation otherwise looks good at
first glance.

Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.131 / U:16.176 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site