![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
>
>>Not exactely :
>>
>>
>>
>>>- if((err=move_addr_to_kernel(umyaddr,addrlen,address))>=0) {
>>
>>>+ err = move_addr_to_kernel(umyaddr, addrlen, address);
>>>+ if (err)
>>>+ goto out_put;
>>
>>
>>The original tests for err >= 0, your replacement tests if err is != 0
>
>
> Look at move_addr_to_kernel(), it only returns 0 or -error.
>
> The patch looks good to me.
>
Right, I had not looked at it in detail. I just reacted to the claim
that "it does exactely the same" but I could see in the posted patch
that it didn't do exactely the same and there was no explanation of why
it was ok to have that difference.
After reading move_addr_to_kernel(), I agree that the patch looks fine.
--
Jesper Juhl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||