![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > > Coda should do the job, too... What are advantages of FUSE over Coda? > > No, it couldn't do the job half as well. You know, I did use Coda, > until I had enough of it. Now look at how many userspace filesystems > were written based on CODA and how many on FUSE. Well, there are filesystems based on NFS, which just plain do not work... So #filesystems is not quite good argument. > Coda is very different. You can only read/write whole files in Coda. > It's got a different attribute invalidation modell, a different access > checking modell. Generally it's much less flexible, which is OK since I know I've asked before... but how is the "fuse-userspace-part swapped out and memory full of dirty data on fuse" deadlock solved? Coda has at least the advantage that coda-userspace-part does not need to be page-locked. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||