[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GPL version, "at your option"?
    On Mer, 2004-11-17 at 16:33, Michael Poole wrote:
    > I have no argument that restricting it to v2 is potentially harmful,
    > but allowing distribution under GPL v3 is also potentially harmful
    > since the terms are not yet known, and later v3plus changes would
    > restrict the whole work to v3plus.

    Oh believe me I understand exactly why Linus said "v2 only". The GPL say
    "similiar license" but Linus doesn't trust Richard. That's fine, I don't
    trust Richard or Linus 8)

    If people are going to say "v2 only" they should most definitely make
    sure they assign Linus or some similar person the right to revisit that


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.019 / U:10.296 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site