![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 06:08 pm, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:43:21PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:54:40 -0800, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > In the meantime, can I please have bind_mode patch applied? I believe > > > > it is useful regardless of which bind/unbind solution will be adopted > > > > and having them will allow me clean up serio bus implementaion quite a > > > > bit.> > > >> > > > Pretty please...> > > > > > Care to resend it? I can't find it in my archives. > > > > > > > Here it is, against 2.6.10-rc2. Apologies for sending it as an attachment > > but this interface will not let me put it inline without mangling.> > No, for now, if you want to do this, do it in the serio code only, let's > clean up the locking first before we do this in the core. > *confused* This patch is completely independent from any locking issues in driver core... It is just 2 flags in device and driver structures that are checked in device_attach and driver_attach. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||