[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject21 million inodes is causing severe pauses.

The subject line is a little deceiving. That number comes from using
XFS on a 2.4 kernel. With a 2.6 kernel, we see problems similar to the
ones we are experiencing on 2.4, only less severe.

Digging into this some more, we determined the problem is the large number
of inodes and dentry items held. For a machine with 32GB of memory and
8 cpus doing build type activity, we have found it stabilizes at between
2 and 8 million entries.

One significant problem we are running into is autofs trying to umount the
file systems. This results in the umount grabbing the BKL and inode_lock,
holding it while it scans through the inode_list and others looking for
inodes used by this super block and attempting to free them.

We patched a SLES9 kernel with the patch found in the -mm tree which
attempts to address this problem by linking inodes off the sb structure.
This does make the umount somewhat quicker, but on a busy nfs mounted
filesystem, the BKL and inode_lock do still get in the way causing
frequent system pauses on the order of seconds. This is on a SLES9
kernel which we just put into a test production environment last Thursday.
By 8:00 AM Friday, the system was unusable.

Additionally, we experience NULL pointer dereferences during
remove_inode_buffers. I have not looked for additional patches in the
-mm tree to address that problem.

While discussing this in the hallway, we have come up with a few possible

1) Have the dentry and inode sizes limited on a per sb basis
with a mount option as an override for the default setting.

2) Have the vfs limit dentry and inode cache sizes based on
slab usage (ie, nfs, ext2, and xfs slab sizes are limited independently
of each other.

3) Have the vfs limit it based on total inode_list entries.

We are not sure which if any is the right direction to go at this time.
We are only hoping to start a discussion. Any guidance would be

Thank you,
Robin Holt

PS: The patch referred to above is:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.064 / U:0.916 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site