[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb
    On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:00:30PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
    > On Saturday 13 November 2004 19:22, Guido Guenther wrote:
    > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    > > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
    > > In 2.6.10-rc1-mm5 {in,out}_8 and read/writeb are exactly identical, only
    > > __raw_{read,write}b is different. So you mean __raw_{read,write}b in the
    > > above? (no nitpicking, just want to be sure I understand this
    > > correctly).
    > Why not use in_be* and out_be* for __raw_read and raw_write? If I
    > understand correctly, they also have barriers. Or would that hurt
    > performance?
    I think it would. XFree86 comes along without these barriers nicely (and
    this this driver was written with documentation ;), so rivafb should be
    o.k. too.
    -- Guido
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.020 / U:5.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site