Messages in this thread |  | | | From | "Antonino A. Daplas" <> | | Subject | Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb | | Date | Sat, 13 Nov 2004 20:00:30 +0800 |
| |
On Saturday 13 November 2004 19:22, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: > In 2.6.10-rc1-mm5 {in,out}_8 and read/writeb are exactly identical, only > __raw_{read,write}b is different. So you mean __raw_{read,write}b in the > above? (no nitpicking, just want to be sure I understand this > correctly).
Why not use in_be* and out_be* for __raw_read and raw_write? If I understand correctly, they also have barriers. Or would that hurt performance?
Tony
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |