![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sul, 2004-10-31 at 20:18, Z Smith wrote: > My laptop's framebuffer is only 800x600x24bpp VESA, or 1406kB. > But look at what X is doing: X has the frame buffer mapped as reported by VESA sizing not the minimal for the mode. (Think about RandR and you'll see why) > root 632 6.1 17.5 22024 16440 ? S 12:05 0:17 X :0 > > The more apps in use, the more memory is used, but at the moment > I've only got xterm, rxvt, thunderbird, xclock and xload. My wm is > blackbox which is using 5 megs. Mostly shared with the other apps, you did remember to divide each page by the number of users ? > Also, just curious but why would memory-mapped I/O be counted > in the memory usage anyway? Shouldn't there be a separate number > for framebuffer memory and the like? Actually there is probably not enough information in /proc to do the maths on it. The kernel itself has a clear idea which vma's are not backed by ram in the usual sense as they are marked VM_IO. > > I've helped write tiny UI kits (take a look at nanogui for example) but > > they don't have the flexibility of X. > > In my experience, most of the flexibility is not necessary for > 97% of what I do, yet it evidently costs a lot in memory usage > and speed. So my X server is 1Mb larger because I can run networked apps and play bzflag. Suits me as a tradeoff - I'm not saying it always is the right decision - nanogui works well in restricted environments like video recorders for example. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||