![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, BlaisorBlade wrote: > On Friday 08 October 2004 23:57, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:> > > On Friday 08 October 2004 22:11, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:> > > > > blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote:> > > Yes I know in the kernel and on i386 it makes no difference, I said that > > already. But on some systems it does make a difference. I have seen it > > myself and I have had it reported. > > > Thinking about it when I said > > architectures I possibly meant to say "other Unix flavours", I think one > > of the *BSDs was the one where I saw the difference between %L and %ll > > manifest itself.> Ok, I thought hardware archs - for other Unixes you're right. > > Sorry for this and thanks for the lesson. Bye> > Sorry, it is not. I find it somewhat strange that you choose gcc and > > glibc to say what is correct... Ever heard of standards?!?> Yes, I heard them, I just never bought ISO standards. Just search google and you will find plenty of places offering them for free download... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||