Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 9 Oct 2004 17:05:12 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Matthew writes: > > CKRM aspires to be both a general purpose resource management framework > > and the embodiment of fair share scheduling. > > I think your missing something here. CKRM, as I understand it, aspires > to be a general purpose resource management framework. To that point I > will accede. But the second part, about CKRM being the embodiment of > fair share scheduling, is secondary.
Ok - you may well be right that CKRM does not aspire to be the embodiment of fair share scheduling. But doesn't it embody a fair share sheduler (and no other such policy) as a matter of current implementation fact?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |