Messages in this thread | | | From | BlaisorBlade <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] dm: fix printk warnings about whether %lu/%Lu is right for sector_t | Date | Sat, 9 Oct 2004 02:04:46 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 08 October 2004 23:57, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Paolo Giarrusso wrote: > > On Friday 08 October 2004 22:11, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it wrote:
> Yes I know in the kernel and on i386 it makes no difference, I said that > already. But on some systems it does make a difference. I have seen it > myself and I have had it reported.
> Thinking about it when I said > architectures I possibly meant to say "other Unix flavours", I think one > of the *BSDs was the one where I saw the difference between %L and %ll > manifest itself. Ok, I thought hardware archs - for other Unixes you're right.
Sorry for this and thanks for the lesson. Bye > Sorry, it is not. I find it somewhat strange that you choose gcc and > glibc to say what is correct... Ever heard of standards?!? Yes, I heard them, I just never bought ISO standards.
-- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |