lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 09 Oct 2004 09:50:30 +1000
FromNick Piggin <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains
Erich Focht wrote:

>>I personally like the hierarchical idea. Machine topologies tend to
>>look tree-like, and every useful sched_domain layout I've ever seen has
>>been tree-like. I think our interface should match that.
>
>
> I like the hierarchical idea, too. The natural way to build it would
> be by starting from the cpus and going up. This tree stands on its
> leafs... and I'm not sure how to express that in a filesystem.
>

Why would you ever want to play around with the internals of the
thing though? Provided you have a way to create exclusive sets of
CPUs, when would you care about doing more?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2009