Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 5 Oct 2004 02:54:47 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: bug in sched.c:activate_task() |
| |
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Con Kolivas wrote:
> unsigned long long delta = now - next->timestamp; > > if (next->activated == 1) > delta = delta * (ON_RUNQUEUE_WEIGHT * 128 / 100) / 128; > > is in schedule() before we update the timestamp, no?
indeed ... so the patch is just random incorrect damage that happened to distrub the scheduler fixing some balancing problem. Kenneth, what precisely is the balancing problem you are seeing?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |