lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
From
Date
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 02:17, Paul Jackson wrote:
> The /dev/cpuset pseudo file system api was chosen because it was
> convenient for small scale work, learning and experimentation, because
> it was a natural for the hierarchical name space with permissions that I
> required, and because it was convenient to leverage existing vfs
> structure in the kernel.

I really like the /dev/cpuset FS. I would like to leverage most of that
code to be the user level interface to creating, linking & destroying
sched_domains at some point. This, of course, is assuming that the
dynamic sched_domains concept meets with something less than catcalls
and jeers... ;)

-Matt

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.707 / U:1.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site