Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement | From | Matthew Dobson <> | Date | Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:24:49 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 02:17, Paul Jackson wrote: > The /dev/cpuset pseudo file system api was chosen because it was > convenient for small scale work, learning and experimentation, because > it was a natural for the hierarchical name space with permissions that I > required, and because it was convenient to leverage existing vfs > structure in the kernel.
I really like the /dev/cpuset FS. I would like to leverage most of that code to be the user level interface to creating, linking & destroying sched_domains at some point. This, of course, is assuming that the dynamic sched_domains concept meets with something less than catcalls and jeers... ;)
-Matt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |