Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:29:47 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Martin writes: > > One doesn't need to completely subsume the other ;-)
Well, close to it.
It's not a marriage of equals in his challenge: > > And CKRM is much more general than the cpu/memsets code, and hence it > should be possible to realize your end-users requirements using an > appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |