lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
    Martin writes:
    > OK, then your "exclusive" cpusets aren't really exclusive at all, since
    > they have other stuff running in them.

    What's clear is that 'exclusive' is not a sufficient precondition for
    whatever it is that CKRM needs to have sufficient control.

    Instead of trying to wrestle 'exclusive' into doing what you want, do me
    a favor, if you would. Help me figure out what conditions CKRM _does_
    need to operate within a cpuset, and we'll invent a new property that
    satisfies those conditions.

    See my earlier posts in the last hour for my efforts to figure out what
    these conditions might be. I conjecture that it's something along the
    lines of:

    Assuring each CKRM instance that it has control of some
    subset of a system that's separate and non-overlapping,
    with all Memory, CPU, Tasks, and Allowed masks of said
    Tasks either wholly owned by that CKRM instance, or
    entirely outside.

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:0.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site