lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
Tim wrote:
> 7 years ago, before cpus_allowed was dreamed up, I proposed a pset patch

One more thing ... the original message from Simon and Sylvain that I
first saw a year ago announcing their cpuset work, which is the basis
for the current cpuset patch in Andrew's tree, began with the lines:


> From: Simon Derr <Simon.Derr@bull.net>
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:59:01 +0200 (DFT)
> To: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
> cc: Sylvain Jeaugey <sylvain.jeaugey@bull.net>
>
> We have developped a new feature in the Linux kernel, controlling CPU
> placements, which are useful on large SMP machines, especially NUMA ones.
> We call it CPUSETS, and we would highly appreciate to know about anyone
> who would be interested in such a feature. This has been somewhat inspired
> by the pset or cpumemset patches existing for Linux 2.4.


So I guess Tim, you (pset) and I (cpumemset) can both claim to
have developed anticedents of this current cpuset proposal.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.368 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site