[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: My thoughts on the "new development model"

    > There seems to be a lot of strange notions on this concept of
    > 'stable'. The only thing that makes a kernel 'stable' is
    > time. Not endless bugfixes. Just time. The idea of stable
    > software is software that not going to give you any suprises,
    > software that you can trust.
    > That's NOT the same as bug free software. For a start,
    > there's no such thing. For another, many bugs are perfectly
    > acceptable in a production environment as long as they're not
    > impacting. (The linux kernel is a very large piece of work.
    > Few installations would use even 20% of the total kernel
    > functionality).

    Yes, perfectly right.
    You would agree (for example) that this:

    > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Danny Brow wrote:
    > Ok, thank you for the feedback, glad you fixed your problem.
    > Now I guess we just need for someone to find out why
    > LEGACY_PTYS breaks
    > ssh (and other apps?) with kernels >= 2.6.9, but I'm afraid
    > thats beyond

    Does not reflect the behaviour of a stable kernel.
    Yes, of course, there's the workaround. But I don't think this bug is
    not impacting.

    I repeat once again. To me something is going in the wrong direction.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.021 / U:26.660 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site