Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix mainline lazyness about TTY layer patch | Date | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:36:13 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:26, DaMouse wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:04:51 +0200, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it > > <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> wrote: > > While changing the TTY layer, an API parameter was removed, so it was > > removed by almost all calls, changing their prototype. But one use of one > > such function was not updated, breaking UML compilation. This is the fix. > > > > Should go in directly - trivial fix. > > > > Thanks for the breakage, too :-).
> > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lazyness > NOW who's lazy :P
Ok, I've flamed a bit, and I get it back.
I'm not English, however that does not qualify as a good reason.
> -DaMouse > -- > I know I broke SOMETHING but its their fault for not fixing it before me
Is that the signature or the actual answer :-)?
However, let's code well, ok? (I don't know whether you're the author, but however, that's not the problem).
Bye -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |