[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: BK kernel workflow

    On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Roman Zippel wrote:
    > Actually the Commit numbers are far more interesting and here you have
    > difference of 56% you haven't explained.

    It's because CVS cannot handle what BK does. So when you do a BK merge,
    there's no way in hell that will be a CVS merge, and instead it ends up
    being one big commit of the branch.

    Merges happen pretty often, so these "big commits" aren't _that_ big
    (certainly nowhere near as big as a CVS banch merge tends to be - if only
    simply because nobody uses CVS for "small branches", the pain isn't worth

    Face it. BK is just better than CVS. It's not a 1:1 mapping.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.021 / U:4.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site