[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The naming wars continue... [u]
Martin Schlemmer [c] wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 21:21 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>Tonnerre wrote:
>>>On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:43:54PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>>>>Having /usr/XnnRmm was a mistake in the first place.
>>>BSD has /X11R6, whilst I'd agree that /opt/xorg is probably a lot more
>>>appropriate. If you want I can take this discussion back to the X.Org
>>>folks again, but I don't think it's actually going to change anything.
>>/opt/X (or /usr/X) is really what it probably should be.
> Except if I am missing something, it is (or was) to be able to
> distinguish between versions that broke protocol compatibility ...
> so except if the protocol will never change again, it should really
> stay as is, and the apps should actually just start to use /usr/bin/X11
> and /usr/lib/X11 that points to the latest or most stable instead of
> the versioned directories ...

This won't get fixed on lkml.
If you want to contribute in this area, try LSB/FHS etc. & Please do.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.135 / U:1.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site