[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The naming wars continue... [u]
    Martin Schlemmer [c] wrote:
    > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 21:21 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >>Tonnerre wrote:
    >>>On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:43:54PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
    >>>>Having /usr/XnnRmm was a mistake in the first place.
    >>>BSD has /X11R6, whilst I'd agree that /opt/xorg is probably a lot more
    >>>appropriate. If you want I can take this discussion back to the X.Org
    >>>folks again, but I don't think it's actually going to change anything.
    >>/opt/X (or /usr/X) is really what it probably should be.
    > Except if I am missing something, it is (or was) to be able to
    > distinguish between versions that broke protocol compatibility ...
    > so except if the protocol will never change again, it should really
    > stay as is, and the apps should actually just start to use /usr/bin/X11
    > and /usr/lib/X11 that points to the latest or most stable instead of
    > the versioned directories ...

    This won't get fixed on lkml.
    If you want to contribute in this area, try LSB/FHS etc. & Please do.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.026 / U:128.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site