lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: lowmem_reserve (replaces protection)
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:54:25AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I agree. I didn't introduce that bug, the very same problem would happen

btw, the severity of such performance bug in the LRU screwup, is minor
compared to the severity of the functional deadlocks or early oom kills
potentially generated by the lack of lowmem_reserve enabled with proper
defaults but sure we need to fix the performance LRU issue too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.141 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site