lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: My thoughts on the "new development model"
The only reason that i brought this up again was that, as written
before, the kernel contains very much bad code. Very much could be
redone to gain both speed and security, imho.
I don't think such a brainstorm is going to happen within a 2.6 "stable" tree.
We need a 2.7 tree for this, then people might want to experiment with
rewrinting old code.

But im not an expert on the Linux kernel, i have no idea really.
I just startet to using 2.5/2.6 at some of the last 2.5 kernels.
That was a whole new world, you could really feel the improvments over 2.4.

--
Mvh / Best regards
Espen Fjellvær Olsen
espenfjo@gmail.com
Norway
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.217 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site