lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.9 latencies: scheduler bug?
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sami Farin <7atbggg02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > forget this stupid ip_tables.c patch, latencies have nothing to do with
> > netfilter code, but bad interaction between xmms, rtc_latencytest
> > and iptables. I now get at max 3.1s (yup, 3100000us) latencies.
> > http://safari.iki.fi/2.6.9-xmms-fun-1.png
> > if you want to reproduce this:
> > 1) run "rtc_latencytest 1024" (can't reproduce with "rtc_latencytest 512")
> > 2) press play in xmms
> > 3) start iptables-script
>
> to further debug any latencies please apply the -RT patchset

which includes also -mm1...

> and enable PREEMPT_TIMING (and LATENCY_TRACING), that enables us to tell us more

I guess those are not available as individual patches which could be
applied to 2.6.9?

Could someone with LATENCY_TRACING+PREEMPT_TIMING try to reproduce
that xmms/rtc_latencytest/iptables thing... takes only a minute.

Pretty please?

> about the latencies. You dont have to enable PREEMPT_REALTIME (the most
> experimental feature of the patchset) to measure latencies.
>
> Ingo

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.044 / U:1.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site