![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
John Hawkes wrote: > From: "John Hawkes" <hawkes@google.engr.sgi.com> > >>No, your variation doesn't solve the problem. This variation of your >>patch does, however, solve the problem. The difference is in >>move_tasks(): > > > Actually, there is another related problem that arises in > active_load_balance() with a runqueue that holds hundreds of pinned processes. > I'm seeing a migration_thread perpetually consuming 70% of its CPU. > That's what I was worried about, but in your most recent patch you just sent, the all_pinned path should skip over the active load balance completely... basically it shouldn't be running at all, and if it is then it is a bug I think? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||