![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds (torvalds@osdl.org) wrote: > Linux-2.6.10-rc1 is out there for your pleasure. > > I thought long and hard about the name of this release (*), since one of > the main complaints about 2.6.9 was the apparently release naming scheme. > > Should it be "-rc1"? Or "-pre1" to show it's not really considered release > quality yet? Or should I make like a rocket scientist, and count _down_ > instead of up? Should I make names based on which day of the week the > release happened? Questions, questions.. > > And the fact is, I can't see the point. I'll just call it all "-rcX", > because I (very obviously) have no clue where the cut-over-point from > "pre" to "rc" is, or (even more painfully obviously) where it will become > the final next release. When you (Linus) think a release is ready to be released, call it -rc1. If you did your job correctly, you can just sit and wait for a few days and release the -rc1 as a new kernel. In the real world though, some bugs may crop up, so you'd be forced to release a rc2. Which in turn may be released unchanged as the final kernel. Releases prior to a release candidate can be called whatever you like. I'd choose -preX ;-) -- Erik Hensema <erik@hensema.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||