Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:00:06 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8 |
| |
* Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry. > > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot > attacks against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain > credibility with the audience that does find it useful.
oh no!
/me watches the flames fan out again as a bushfire
do you expect there to be any meaningful technical discussion resulting out of you calling Jens' (valid) comments 'idiot attacks'? Fact is, upstream couldnt care less about PREEMPT_REALTIME and/or the deadlock detector at this point. Upstream _never_ cared about any not yet merged (and in this case, completely unfinished) feature.
/me apologizes to Jens
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |