![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Espen Fjellvær Olsen wrote: > On 10/23/2004 07:05 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>Ok, >> Linux-2.6.10-rc1 is out there for your pleasure. >> >>I thought long and hard about the name of this release (*), since one of >>the main complaints about 2.6.9 was the apparently release naming scheme. >> >>Should it be "-rc1"? Or "-pre1" to show it's not really considered release >>quality yet? Or should I make like a rocket scientist, and count _down_ >>instead of up? Should I make names based on which day of the week the >>release happened? Questions, questions.. > > > Do the -rcs first, let them contain everything that should go into the > next release. > And when you feel that you have released enough -rcs(Uh, whenever that > is...) release the -pres. > They should only contain critical bugfixes before the final release. Well, several of us think that -pre's should come before the -rc's and not after them. It appears that we should concentrate on the NAME=Zonked Quokka part of Makefile for our sanity. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||