lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?
    David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com> wrote:

    > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Timothy Miller wrote:
    >
    > > Sure, SOME companies release specs so that we can develop
    > > open source drivers, but those cards tend to be prohibitively expensive,
    > > slower than their cheaper counterparts from ATI or nVidia...
    >
    > Tim, I think this is the key problem. with the current ATI/nVidia
    > cards beign in the $50 range (with other cards on the market for
    > as low as $30) are you really going to be able to come up with a
    > card that's price competitive? (completely ignoring the
    > performance question)
    >
    > as for your other question of if an open approach could be viable
    > (after all nobody does it today so doesn't that proove it isn't)
    >
    > this is where there is a significant disagreement. the Linux folks
    > think that such openess would be very viable and the companies are
    > just pursuing a legacy approach, but the companies are scared to
    > open things up becouse they don't believe that they would remain
    > viable.
    >
    > since nobody has done this yet (for video cards anyeay) there is
    > no proof one way or the other.

    Wrong. Companies *have* tried to go down the Open Source route and it did
    not work out for them. ATI in particular. At one point ATI released all
    the register level information and in fact released sample 3D driver
    source code to the community for the early Radeon chipsets. Unfortunately
    the Linux and Open Source community never stepped up to the plate to
    support ATI in this effort. There are solid business reasons that ATI has
    explained to me for why ATI decided to give up on the Open Source
    approach and go back to proprietary 3D drivers for Linux.

    For 2D they continue to maintain XFree86/X.org drivers with full source
    code for the community, just not 3D.

    If someone wishes to go down this route, more power to them. But I don't
    think it is a viable way to make money for a business. The biggest
    problem is that even if every active Linux or Open Source kernel
    developer decided to buy one of these cards, that is a pretty small
    market. The unfortunate fact I have come to realise is that there is a
    very large contingent of Linux end users out there who just want free
    stuff. Free as in free beer. They could care less whether the source code
    is available as long as they don't pay for it. Those same users are also
    more than happy to install ATI or NVIDIA proprietary kernel modules and
    taint their kernel so they can get 3D support when running Linux and
    still run their favorite games at full speed under Windows. Those same
    users probably won't pay a premium to get a 3D card that is slower than
    an ATI or NVIDIA just because it has source code for the drivers.

    Sad but true IMHO.

    Regards,

    ---
    Kendall Bennett
    Chief Executive Officer
    SciTech Software, Inc.
    Phone: (530) 894 8400
    http://www.scitechsoft.com

    ~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:8.503 / U:0.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site