Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:34:13 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: ZONE_PADDING wastes 4 bytes of the new cacheline |
| |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >looks reasonable. only cons is that this rejects on my tree ;), pages_* >and protection is gone in my tree, replaced by watermarks[] using the >very same optimal and proven algo of 2.4 (enabled by default of course). >I'll reevaluate the false sharing later on. >
May I again ask what you think is wrong with ->protection[] apart from it being turned off by default? (I don't think our previous conversation ever reached a conclusion...)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |