[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
    Scott Wood wrote:

    >On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 06:15:00PM -0400, john cooper wrote:
    >>Yes, but my concern was having to backoff in out-of-sequence
    >>spinlock acquisition paths.
    >Out-of-sequence acquisition is a bug, unless the caller uses trylocks
    >and handles backoff itself.
    Understood -- we may be getting hung up on terminology here.

    Rather the issue was whether the nondeterministic out-of-sequence
    backoff could be pushed to a noncritical path. I believe so.
    It is further likely a backoff would not be needed as the
    a path acquiring a mutex's task-owned list lock during a
    priority promotion scan shouldn't have reason to acquire any
    task's mutex-owned list lock. The latter list would only need
    to be locked at time of successful mutex acquisition/free.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.019 / U:36.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site