[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Module compilation
    On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

    > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote>
    >> ...but it's not CFLAGS that needs to be modified, it's
    >> a named variable that doesn't exist yet, perhaps "USERDEF",
    >> or "DEFINES".
    > Reading the above I cannot what amkes you say that EXTRA_CFLAGS
    > or CFLAGS_module.o cannot be used?
    > Is it the name you do not like or is it some fnctionality
    > you are missing?

    The name is wrong! There are zillions of ways to obtain the
    functionality. Currently we need to piggy-back definitions
    onto compiler flags.

    Compiler flags are things like "-Wall" and "-O2", that tell
    the compiler what to do. We need a name to use for definitions,
    "-Dxxx", that #define constants (dynamically at compile-time)
    in the code. Right now, -DMODULE and -D__KERNEL__ are piggybacked
    onto CFLAGS. There really should be a variable called something
    else like DEFINES and it should be exported.

    >> I see that the normal "defines" is a constant
    >> called "CHECKFLAGS", so this isn't appropriate for user
    >> modification.
    > CHECKFLAGS is only used when you use "make C=1" - to pass options
    > to sparse.
    > Sam

    Dick Johnson
    Penguin : Linux version 2.6.9 on an i686 machine (5537.79 GrumpyMips).
    98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.024 / U:0.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site