Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:50:27 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Am I paranoid or is everyone out to break my kernel builds (Breakage in drivers/pcmcia) |
| |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:31:35AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > Take special note of the '&' before 'num' in the above initialiser, and > > check the structure: > > Something's out of whack with your tree. You should have:
Ok, but what's the point of the change? If it's to indicate that we're returning a value, shouldn't the other module_param* macros also be fixed in the same way, or do we just like special cases?
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |