lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8
FromThomas Gleixner <>
DateThu, 21 Oct 2004 11:47:52 +0200
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 11:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:16:30AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 11:12, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> > > [<e018e139>] queuecommand+0x70/0x7c [usb_storage] (24)
> >
> > As I already pointed out, this is a problem due to up(sema) in
> > queuecommand. That's one of the semaphore abuse points, which needs to
> > be fixed.
> >
> > The problem is that semaphores are hold by Process A and released by
> > Process B, which makes Ingo's checks trigger
>
> Which is perfectly valid for a semaphore.
>

In fact this is used where wait_for_completion() is the correct thing to
do. It's not waiting for a resource. It's waiting for completion of a
commoand.

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2010